Showing posts with label depth of field. Show all posts
Showing posts with label depth of field. Show all posts

Sunday, 6 November 2011

Finally, my deep depth of field images!

Taken randomly round my room at home, just trying it out. Was easy!

(ISO - 100) f22 3.2 Secs
(ISO - 3200) f22 1/3

(ISO - 3200) f22 1/3

(ISO - 3200) f22 1/3

(ISO - 2500) f22 1/3

(ISO - 3200) f22 1/3

(ISO - 3200) f22 1/3
The first thing I did was make sure the aperture was on a high number, I then made the shutter speed longer too, though some attempts (like the first) came out quite dark and the slow shutter speed made blurriness/camera shake more noticable. After this I raised the ISO number so that it would read more light, then I was able to speed up the shutter speed until it was at the correct exposure. 

Monday, 10 October 2011

(Response)My Assignment Images:

So today I decided to do some Alternate Focusing. I just basically went around my accommodation flat doing this as a trial.
(ISO - 1600) f6.3 1/30


(ISO - 1600) f6.3 1/30
(ISO - 1600) f6.3 1/30


(ISO - 1600) f6.3 1/30


(ISO - 1600) f6.3 1/30
 These images are quite distance driven in terms of focus, I started off with a normal shot of my boots in focus, then I had to aim the lens a little higher in the next image to get the background in focus instead. I then carried on by photographing the unusual things that you would expect to be in focus like my card reader on the floor or my sprays on the shelf in my bathroom. I then attempted a night shot through the unwashed glass windows with part of the frame in view, it looks like a spy view! This was my attempt in focusing through a pattern with holes in as the glass was patchy.

(ISO - 1600) f6.3 1/30


(ISO - 1600) f8 1/30
(ISO - 1600) f8 1/30


I then found this bin that is actually a laundry basket. It has all these holes in and the rubbish inside looked quite colourful even if it was a disgusting type of subject to pick, I thought I would try anyway. So I took 3 attempts with it, I had to close the aperture since it was too bright on the first one, then the last one was to reframe it differently.

Like I said, these are only trial images, so I'll photograph some interesting shots when I explore the area a bit more some day soon!

Monday, 3 October 2011

(Response)My Assignment Images:


The first task given is to create a series of images that demonstrate the differentiation of aperture using the same subject and lighting conditions, this should hopefully show the depth of field changing throughout also.

(ISO – 1600) f5.6 1/50
(ISO – 1600) f8 1/25
(ISO – 1600) f16 1/6
(ISO – 1600) f22 1/3
COMMENT  (28/9/11) – Since I’ve not long got used to changing the apertures correctly on a DSLR, I only tried to aim to demonstrate the 4 differences in this depth of field technique. Later on I may add images and do it with more settings/subjects!




(Opinions)Diary Of Photography Findings:

28/9/11 – Searching the internet for answers is not always advisable, today I decided to move around settings to capture the correct aperture in my room, eventually, I realized that my aperture needed to open up to get a brighter result, using the reciprocity law, I also adjusted the shutter speed upwards. After a few adjustments I actually got the aperture correct! So it goes to show that experimenting is a wonderful way of finding out things. I also managed to try and experiment with aperture and it’s resulting depth of field.

(Response) More Test Shots:

(ISO – 1600) f5.6 1/50

(ISO – 1600) f5.6 1/50
COMMENT (28/9/11) – So these are my test shots once I figured out how to set the correct exposure, I just kept taking photo after photo, these were the best ones that I feel demonstrate the technique I was trying to result in. Both shallow depth of field, one a close up of a sweet wrapper and the other demonstrating different focus points so the nearest plug was in focus. 

(ISO – 1600) f5.6 1/50
COMMENT (28/9/11) – This is another image I did, as you can see, I’d changed the central focus point using the live mode and moving the square with the arrow buttons surrounding ‘select’ which made the focus more visible in the top left. So you can see on this Celebrations box, the ‘C’ is standing out. This tool will be useful for photographing a number of objects and only wanting to highlight a certain area without adjusting your physical framing and just changing the focused area.

(Research) The Facts/Theories:


Depth of field is the amount of focusing in an image; it usually is defined by background and foreground. So if either of them is out of focus, it has a SHALLOW DEPTH OF FIELD. If both factors; the entire image; is in focus, then it is known as DEEP DEPTH OF FIELD. 
(Source: flickr)
Depth of field and aperture are closely related – beside the controls of brightness. Aperture is the hole inside the lens in which opens up to let light in, this controls how much light is going through the lens. This is measured in something called F-STOPS; they range from around f/2.8 to f/22. The term STOPPING DOWN is basically halving/descending in the numerical scale of these stops; STOPPING DOWN doubles/ascends the number. 

(source: Google Images)
There is often confusion in recognizing the relation between the size of the hole and the f-number itself, usually; the smaller number would feel right to match the smaller hole. In fact, this does not apply, the larger the number, the smaller the hole and the smaller the number, the bigger the hole.
The way this works is through the light rays; this is called the CIRCLE OF CONFUSION. This is the circle of light formed by the lens through the aperture hole, the less spread out the light rays, the less areas of focus there is, hence the smaller hole having less focused features in an image.

(Source: Google Images)

(Source: Google Images)
The differences between lenses and depth of field are quite contrasting. Taking an image far back with a wide angle lens gets the whole scene into focus, whereas the same distance with a zoom/telephoto lens, the tighter frame has a shallower depth of field. The reasons that these lenses do this, is because a zoom lens is thinner, it’s shaped in a concave way, therefore the light rays passing through in a thin path, a wide angle lens is much thicker and it’s more curved to spread the light ray path. With a macro lens, they have very shallow depth of field; this is because they are built to only focus a few inches out from the lens itself. Whereas, with landscape photography, focusing on the infinite gives a much deeper depth of field. (images)
To summarize these findings and to define facts that I can use within this assignment, here are the ways to achieve the desired depth of field.
Shallow depth of field requires: A large aperture, a closer distance to the subject and zooming in for a longer focal length.
Deep depth of field requires: A small aperture, a larger distance from the subject and zooming out for a shorter focal length.